– Pierre Bréchon, Frédéric Gonthier, Les valeurs des Européens. Évolutions et clivages, Paris, Armand Colin (U), 2014.

– Stanley Brunn, The Changing World Religion Map. Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics, Springer, 2014.

– Aleksandra Lewicki, Social Justice through Citizenship? The Politics of Muslim Integration in Germany and Great Britain, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

– Mizrap Polat  (dir.), Religion im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Mit besonderem Fokus auf Kollektivität und Bildung im Islam, Frankfurt am Main…, Peter Lang, 2014.

Au-delà de la binarité “intérieur-extérieur”

Un appel à contribution est ouvert pour un ouvrage Beyond Insider Outsider Binaries: New Approaches in the Study of Religion, George D. Chryssides (Honorary Research Fellow in Contemporary Religion, University of Birmingham, UK), Stephen E. Gregg (Senior Lecturer in Religious Studies, University of Wolverhampton, UK).

It has become clear that binary notions of religious belonging, based upon narrow views of religion as a monolithic category of participation, are no longer tenable within the Study of Religion. Similarly, recent scholarship has emphasised a relational approach to engagement with religious communities and individuals, critiquing previous conceptions of scholastic objectivity and participation. However, much pedagogy and research about religion and religions still uses insider and outsider categories uncritically. As methodology within the study of religion – and particularly the study of everyday religion – has developed in the last decade, a more nuanced understanding of what it means to be an insider or outsider is needed. Indeed, this focus upon the performance of everyday religious lives must lead to a re-evaluation of ‘what religion is’, thus complicating issues of situation and approach to religion and religious communities. In so doing, we complicate the associated relationships religious practitioners and scholars have with these religious individuals and communities. Quite simply, when we re-negotiate ‘what religion is’ and ‘what religious people do’, with the subsequent challenging of sacred/profane dichotomies, we create a landscape where structured and restrictive notions of ‘insideness’ or ‘outsideness’ may no longer apply. If this is indeed the case, we need to re-focus upon performed everyday narratives and malleable, often complicated and contested, religious identities at the overlaps and edges between researchers, individuals and religious hierarchies, communities and worldviews.
Call for Chapters
The editors seek high quality original scholarship from a variety of international and multi-thematic and multi-disciplinary approaches to the study of religion in contemporary contexts. Chapters may be related to a particular religious community or tradition, or may focus upon a particular issue or methodological approach. Chapters should be 8,000-10,000 words in length. Examples of particular issues relevant to insider/outsider debate may include, but are not limited to:
• Teaching and researching religion ‘after the world religions paradigm’
• Sociological approaches to membership of religious communities
• Ethnographic issues for researchers in relation to religious communities
• Particular issues in researching controversial or problematic host communities
• Contested religious identities within and between religious movements
• Complicated processes of joining or leaving religious communities – converts, seekers, leavers and apostates.
• Theoretical and methodological approaches within the Study of Religion
• Public discourse on religious belonging and identity
Deadline: Potential contributors should email or with a title, 250 word abstract, and 250 word personal profile, including institution affiliation and research profile, before 1st November 2014. It is anticipated that final chapter submissions will be required by 1st September 2015.

Couple, viol, et religion

De façon inhabituelle, dans une enquête portant sur le degré de connaissance de la pénalisation du viol conjugal réalisé pour Femme actuelle, l’IFOP fournit notamment des résultats prenant en compte l’appartenance religieuse.
On apprend ainsi que 86% des Français savent que le viol conjugal est puni par la loi. Ce taux monte à 91% pour les catholiques (allant jusqu’à 94% pour les pratiquants réguliers, mais seulement 87% pour les non pratiquants). Les autres religions sont partagées entre « protestants » et « autres religions ». On peut noter que le degré de connaissance est particulièrement élevé parmi les protestants (98%) et particulièrement bas pour les « autres religions » (65%). Mais ces données sont trop peu détaillées pour que l’on puisse hasarder la moindre hypothèse d’explication (facteurs directement religieux, seulement religieux ?) : avis aux chercheurs…

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search